Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boros Leyline | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Mono-Red Aggro | alessandro_cecconi | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | daniele visintin | 9-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | shoji kimura | 9-3 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | jiří kračman | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | matteo soldi | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | kyohei murayama | 6-6 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Leyline , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Dinosaurs , Gruul Leyline , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Control , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Phoenix of Ash ranks #2907 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 57%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Phoenix of Ash is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 2.95 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Phoenix of Ash has a win rate of 57.6%, making it 21.4% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spikefield Hazard | Instant | 7 | 53.4% | 0 |
| Ball Lightning | Creature — Elemental | 5 | 51.8% | 0 |
| Roiling Vortex | Enchantment | 11 | 51.2% | 0 |
| Rampaging Ferocidon | Creature — Dinosaur | 9 | 49.9% | 0 |
| Chandra, Torch of Defiance | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 7 | 49.1% | 0 |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 9 | 49.0% | 0 |
| Wrenn's Resolve | Sorcery | 6 | 48.9% | 0 |
| Incendiary Flow | Sorcery | 6 | 48.9% | 0 |
| Chandra, Dressed to Kill | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 7 | 48.8% | 0 |
| Laelia, the Blade Reforged | Legendary Creature — Spirit Warrior | 10 | 48.4% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Phoenix of Ash than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shark Typhoon | Enchantment | 6 | 7 | 70.7% | 57.5% | +13.1% |
| Lovestruck Beast | Creature — Beast Noble | 3 | 5 | 68.4% | 57.1% | +11.4% |
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 7 | 69.0% | 57.9% | +11.1% |
| Brushfire Elemental | Creature — Elemental | 2 | 5 | 68.4% | 57.5% | +10.9% |
| Edgewall Innkeeper | Creature — Human Peasant | 1 | 5 | 68.4% | 58.1% | +10.4% |
| Brazen Borrower | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 3 | 10 | 66.7% | 57.0% | +9.7% |
| Vivien, Monsters' Advocate | Legendary Planeswalker — Vivien | 5 | 5 | 75.0% | 65.8% | +9.2% |
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 2 | 13 | 67.1% | 59.6% | +7.5% |
| Kazandu Mammoth | Creature — Elephant | 3 | 5 | 68.4% | 61.1% | +7.3% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 14 | 64.4% | 57.2% | +7.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono-Red Aggro | 31 | 7.2% | 40.0% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 16 | 2.1% | 38.6% |
| Izzet Prowess | 11 | 1.1% | 48.5% |
| Gruul Delirium | 3 | 1.8% | 42.9% |
| Gruul Leyline | 2 | 0.8% | 50.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.